Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed26 May 20266003058

Tanglefields, Lower South Park, South Godstone, RH9 8LF

Planning appeal 6003058 at Tanglefields, Lower South Park, South Godstone, RH9 8LF (Tandridge District Council) was allowed on 26 May 2026 by Inspector Glasin J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development is inappropriate.

for the conversion of existing garage building to two-bedroom detached dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Glasin J
Postcode
RH9 8LF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the development is inappropriate
  • the effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether the development is in a sustainable location
  • whether very special circumstances exist

What decided it

The engagement of paragraph 11(d) of the NPPF due to the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply, combined with the reuse of an existing building in a sustainable location, provided very special circumstances that outweighed the limited harm to Green Belt openness.

The limited harm to Green Belt openness was clearly outweighed by the significant positive weight afforded to housing land supply shortfall, the reuse of an existing building without material alterations, the sustainable location, and the modest contribution to rural community vitality.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DP7DP10DP13CSP18CSP21
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 55Paragraph 131Paragraph 135Paragraph 153Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

16 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tandridge District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed29 October 20266006369
    Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
  2. Dismissed14 October 20266008351
    Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266007518
    Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
  4. Dismissed23 September 20266008688
    Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
  5. Dismissed22 September 20266011736
    Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.