Planning appeal decision
Former Wood Store, Adlington Hall, Mill Lane, Adlignton, Cheshire East, SK10 4LF
Planning appeal 6003081 at Former Wood Store, Adlington Hall, Mill Lane, Adlignton, Cheshire East, SK10 4LF (Cheshire East) was dismissed on 15 April 2026 by Inspector Veevers A, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the significance of the appeal building as a NDHA, and whether the proposal would preserve the special architectural or historic interest, including settings, of the Grade II* registered Park and Garden known as Adlington Hall, the Grade I listed Adlington Hall (the Hall) and the Grade II listed Gate Piers and Gates to North Approach of Adlington Hall (the North Gates).
conversion of former wood store to 1 no. residential dwelling with car parking, landscaping, boundary treatments and ancillary works
- Authority
- Cheshire East
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Veevers A
- Postcode
- SK10 4LF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the significance of the appeal building as a NDHA, and whether the proposal would preserve the special architectural or historic interest, including settings, of the Grade II* registered Park and Garden known as Adlington Hall, the Grade I listed Adlington Hall (the Hall) and the Grade II listed Gate Piers and Gates to North Approach of Adlington Hall (the North Gates)
- The effect of the proposal on the landscape character of the area
- The effect of the proposal on European Protected Species, namely bats
- Whether the proposal would accord with the Council's development plan strategy for the location of housing, with particular regard to accessibility to services and facilities
What decided it
The cumulative heritage harm to the non-designated and designated heritage assets provided a strong reason for refusal that disapplied the presumption in favour of sustainable development, and this harm was not outweighed by the limited benefits of the scheme.
The limited benefits of the scheme (heritage repair, economic/social gains, footway improvements, housing contribution) were found insufficient to outweigh the totality of harm to designated and non-designated heritage assets, landscape character and protected bats, so the balance tipped against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SE1Policy SE7Policy SD2Policy RUR14Policy HER4Policy HER5Policy HER7Policy SE4Policy ENV3Policy SD1Policy SE3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 216Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 139Paragraph 193Paragraph 84Paragraph 83Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cheshire East
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed27 October 20266004692Land Adjoining Jenny Heyes, Heyes Lane, Alderley Edge, SK9 7LH
- Dismissed23 October 2026601496610 Cocksheadhey Road, Bollington, Macclesfield, SK10 5QZ
- Dismissed22 October 20266013754Teal House 4 Shrewbridge Walk, Baddington Lane Baddington Lane, Nantwich, CW5 8AF
- Dismissed20 October 2026601434367 Earle St, Crewe, CW1 2AS
- Dismissed16 October 20266015255Somerford Grange Trap Road, Somerford Booths, Congleton, CW12 2LT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®