Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 March 20266003089

8 Woolsington Park South, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE13 8BJ

erection of porch extension, first floor extension to create an additional storey, and 1.2m boundary wall to front and alterations to elevations (from amended plans received 12/08/2025) without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 2024/0115/01/HOU, dated 13 August 2025

Authority
Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Jones H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal to vary condition 2 would result in a development which would amount to inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • The effect that the proposal to vary condition 2 would have on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • The effect that the proposal to vary condition 2 would have on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect that the proposal to vary condition 2 would have on the living conditions of the occupiers of Hollywell Reins, in respect of outlook and privacy, and of the occupiers of 6 Woolsington Park South, in respect of outlook only
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing substantial harm, and the other considerations do not clearly outweigh this harm to amount to very special circumstances.

Framework references: 153, 154

Plan policies cited: DM20, CS1, DM23, DM31, CS15, CS19

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.