Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 April 20266003112

35 St Mark's Road, Smethwick, Sandwell, B67 6QF

Planning appeal 6003112 at 35 St Mark's Road, Smethwick, Sandwell, B67 6QF (Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 2 April 2026 by Inspector Morris T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed two-storey side extension and the single storey front extension on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area.

double storey side and single storey rear extension

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Morris T
Postcode
B67 6QF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed two-storey side extension and the single storey front extension on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area
  • The effect of the proposed two-storey side extension and the single storey front extension on the living conditions of occupiers of 37 St Marks Road in terms of outlook, daylight and sunlight

What decided it

The two-storey side extension would be a bulky and obtrusive addition that would erode the balance, symmetry and spaciousness of the street scene and create a terracing effect contrary to development plan policies and design guidance, and the single storey front extension would cause unacceptable harm to the outlook and daylight of the neighbouring property.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy ENV3 of the Black Country Core Strategy (2011)Policy SAD EOS 9 of the Site Allocations and Delivery Development Plan Document (2012)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

71 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266014671
    68 Abbotsford Avenue, Great Barr, Birmingham, B43 6HD
  2. Dismissed14 October 20266012406
    64 Wolverhampton Road, Oldbury, B68 0LJ
  3. Allowed23 September 20266010155
    Former Crown Inn, 97 Station Road, Cradley Heath, B64 6NT
  4. Notice varied and upheld16 September 20263371483
    48 Parsons Hill, Oldbury, B68 9BS
  5. Notice varied and upheld16 September 20263371468
    50 Parsons Hill, Oldbury, B68 9BS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.