Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed9 June 20266003387

37 Westbere Drive, Stanmore, HA7 4RF

Planning appeal 6003387 at 37 Westbere Drive, Stanmore, HA7 4RF (London Borough of Harrow) was allowed on 9 June 2026 by Inspector E Fawcett, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the appeal site and the surrounding area.

a single storey rear extension, two storey side extension to provide new attached dwelling at side, rear dormer, roof lights in front roof slope, associated cycle and bin storage and car parking, and separate amenity space

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
E Fawcett
Postcode
HA7 4RF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the appeal site and the surrounding area
  • whether the site is a suitable location for the proposal having regard to relevant development plan policies concerning residential development
  • whether the proposal would meet the requirements of Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG)

What decided it

The proposal's compliance with the adopted Local Plan policies on garden land development (GR10) and small housing developments (HO3), combined with its high-quality design that respects local character and the availability of mechanisms to discharge the statutory Biodiversity Net Gain obligation, justified allowing the appeal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London Plan Policy D3Local Plan Policy GR1Local Plan Policy GR10Local Plan Policy HO3London Plan Policy H2Local Plan Policy HO2London Plan Policy D12London Plan Policy G6Local Plan Policy GI3

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

418 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Harrow

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed5 October 20266005188
    147 Eastcote Lane, Harrow, HA2 8RR
  2. Dismissed30 September 20266005822
    Former National Grid Site, Marsh Lane, Stanmore, HA7 2SN
  3. Dismissed21 September 20266010702
    28 Wychwood Close, Canons Park, Edgware, HA8 6TE
  4. Allowed28 August 20266009581
    306A Harrow View, Harrow, HA2 6QQ
  5. Allowed11 August 20266011021
    90 Woodlands, North Harrow, Harrow, HA2 6EW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.