White Raven, 21 Dome Hill Peak, Caterham, CR3 6EH

Planning appeal 6003392 at White Raven, 21 Dome Hill Peak, Caterham, CR3 6EH (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 10 June 2026 by Inspector John Morrison, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether it would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

erection of a first floor side extension and the extension of the rear dormer to provide an internal domestic mobility lift

Authority: Tandridge District Council
Appeal type: householder · Householder
Procedure: Written
Development: residential
Inspector: John Morrison
Postcode: CR3 6EH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

Whether it would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
Its effect on the openness of the Green Belt
Its effect on the character and appearance of the area
Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal's status as inappropriate development in the Green Belt with substantial harm to openness and character, which was not clearly outweighed by the appellant's personal health circumstances, meant the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development did not exist.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Policy DP10Policy DP13Policy DP7Policy CP18
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

105 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Tandridge District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

Allowed29 October 20266006369
Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
Dismissed14 October 20266008351
Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
Dismissed13 October 20266007518
Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
Dismissed23 September 20266008688
Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
Dismissed22 September 20266011736
Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.