Planning appeal decision
169 East Meadway, Birmingham, B33 0EN
single storey rear extension
- Authority
- Birmingham City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Harris-Watkins D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of 171 East Meadway, with particular regard to outlook and light
What decided it
The proposal would cause unacceptable adverse impact on the living conditions of the neighbouring property through loss of sunlight and overshadowing, conflicting with the development plan with no material considerations to outweigh that conflict.
Plan policies cited: Policy DM10, Policy DM2, Policy PG3
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®