Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 March 20266003435

169 East Meadway, Birmingham, B33 0EN

single storey rear extension

Authority
Birmingham City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Harris-Watkins D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of 171 East Meadway, with particular regard to outlook and light

What decided it

The proposal would cause unacceptable adverse impact on the living conditions of the neighbouring property through loss of sunlight and overshadowing, conflicting with the development plan with no material considerations to outweigh that conflict.

Plan policies cited: Policy DM10, Policy DM2, Policy PG3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.