Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision3 March 20266003448

Sandstones, Burnhams Road, Bookham, Surrey, KT23 3AU

single storey front extension, replacement of front, side and rear roof with pitched roof, erection of a rear dormer window to facilitate loft conversion with rooflight and solar panels to front and dormer window to rear

Authority
Mole Valley District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Lawrence E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the proposal on the host dwelling

What decided it

The rear dormer extension would unacceptably harm the character and appearance of the host dwelling through its dominant, top-heavy and awkward appearance, conflicting with design policies, whereas the front extension and roof works would respect the host dwelling and comply with policies.

Framework references: 135, 187

Plan policies cited: Policy EN4, Policy BKEN2, Mole Valley Design Guidance for House Extensions and outbuildings Supplementary Planning Document 2025 paragraphs 5.23 to 5.27

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.