Planning appeal decision
Robinia, 18 Blyth Hall, Blyth, Worksop, S81 8HL
- Authority
- Bassetlaw
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Postcode
- S81 8HL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Appeal A: the effect of the proposed development upon the settings of the listed Church and the Conservation Area (the designated heritage assets); and the character and appearance of the area outside of the Conservation Area, including the host property
- Appeal B: whether the disputed conditions are reasonable and necessary, with particular regard to the effect of the approved development upon the settings of the designated heritage assets; and the character and appearance of the area outside the Conservation Area, including the host property
What decided it
The scale and siting of the proposed front extension to Appeal A would intrude into and detract from views of the listed Church's tower, roofscape and facing elevation at the entrance to the street, causing less than substantial but considerable harm to the settings of the designated heritage assets that could not be justified by the limited public benefits offered.
The less than substantial but considerable harm to the settings of the Conservation Area and listed Church from Appeal A was weighed against the limited public benefits (temporary construction-phase economic benefits), and the harm was found to outweigh the benefits, requiring dismissal in accordance with paragraph 215 of the Framework
Framework references: 208, 212, 213, 215
Plan policies cited: Policy ST33, Policy ST40, Policy ST41
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®