Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 May 20266003512

Land To Rear of Whitethorne, Chapel Road, Limpsfield, Surrey, RH8 0SX

Erection of a self build detached dwelling with green house and detached garage; associated boundary works including widening of existing vehicular access

Authority
Tandridge District Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Glassar S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The location of the site
  • Pedestrian and cycle safety
  • If the proposed development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposed development

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause substantial harm to its openness and openness, which cannot be clearly outweighed by the benefits of housing supply and self-build provision.

The substantial weight given to Green Belt harm and harm to openness was not clearly outweighed by the benefits of housing delivery, self-build provision, economic benefits, and biodiversity net gain, therefore very special circumstances were not demonstrated.

Framework references: 11, 116, 153, 154, 155, 156

Plan policies cited: Policy DP10, Policy DP13, Policy DP5

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.