Planning appeal decision
Land to the South of Whittingham Lane & West of James Towers Way, Broughton, Preston, PR3 5DD
Planning appeal 6003578 at Land to the South of Whittingham Lane & West of James Towers Way, Broughton, Preston, PR3 5DD (Preston) was allowed on 10 August 2026 by Inspector Helen Hockenhull, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development is in a suitable location for housing having regard to the development plan.
outline planning application seeking approval for access only from Whittingham Lane (all other matters reserved) for the erection of a care home (up to 4,700 sqm), a community building (up to 400 sq m), residential development (up to 167dwellings) and land reserved for primary school with associated works to include landscaping and green infrastructure
- Authority
- Preston
- Appeal type
- major · Planning
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- Helen Hockenhull
- Postcode
- PR3 5DD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development is in a suitable location for housing having regard to the development plan
- the effect of the proposal on the Area of Separation
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety with regard to the strategic, local and internal road networks
What decided it
The cumulative weight of housing, affordable housing, economic and community/social benefits was found to outweigh the identified policy conflict, even without resolving the disputed five-year housing land supply position.
the benefits of market and affordable housing delivery, economic benefits and substantial social/community benefits (care home, community centre, allotments, school land) outweighed the policy harm arising from conflict with CS Policy 1 and LP Policy EN1, applying a flat balance regardless of five-year housing land supply status
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS Policy 1LP Policy EN1NP Policy RES1CS Policy 19LP Policy EN4CS Policy 4CS Policy 2CS Policy 3LP Policy ST2CS Policy 25LP Policy 25CS Policy 23NP Policy RES1.1NP Policy ICF1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 116Paragraph 96
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Preston
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed28 September 2026600966910 Broadgate, Preston, PR1 8DX
- Dismissed25 September 20266006018454 Blackpool Road, Preston, PR2 1HX
- Dismissed18 May 20266002018Garstang Road, Broughton, PR3 5LQ
- Dismissed24 March 20266003019169, Sharoe Green Lane, Preston, PR2 8HE
- Dismissed2 February 202633732023, The Triangle, Preston, PR2 8LJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®