Planning appeal decision
4 & 6 Love Lane, Rayleigh, SS6 7DL
Planning appeal 6003620 at 4 & 6 Love Lane, Rayleigh, SS6 7DL (Rochford) was dismissed on 7 August 2026 by Inspector Simon Rawle, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including having regard to the impact of the proposed development on a heritage asset and a protected tree.
to demolish existing buildings on site and construct a new, 3 storey building housing 7 flats with allocated parking spaces to the rear
- Authority
- Rochford
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- Simon Rawle
- Postcode
- SS6 7DL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including having regard to the impact of the proposed development on a heritage asset and a protected tree
- Whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers with regard to the provision of private amenity space and the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of 8 Love Lane, with particular reference to privacy and outlook
- The effect of the proposal on highway safety and whether there would be adequate cycle parking provision
- Whether adequate information has been provided to determine whether or not the proposal would unacceptably harm protected species
- Whether or not the proposed development would meet the requirements for the provision of biodiversity net gain
What decided it
The significant harm to character and appearance, heritage setting, protected tree, neighbouring living conditions, and highway safety, when weighed against moderate benefits from housing delivery, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits under the Framework taken as a whole.
The moderate benefits of housing delivery and efficient use of a sustainable location were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance, heritage setting, protected tree, neighbouring living conditions, and highway safety.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM1Policy DM3Policy DM25Policy T6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rochford
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed27 August 202660080135 Marshalls, Rochford, SS4 1SP
- Dismissed10 August 2026600468733-35 Castle Road, Rayleigh, SS6 7QD
- Allowed9 July 202660048639 College Gardens, Rochford, SS4 1YL
- Allowed23 October 20253364836Land Rear of 17 Hillside Road, Hockley, Essex, SS5 4RT
- Allowed15 September 2025336516519 Lee Lots, Great Wakering, Essex, SS30HA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®