Planning appeal decision
The Bulrushes, Coombe Hill Road, East Grinstead, RH19 4LZ
Planning appeal 6003631 at The Bulrushes, Coombe Hill Road, East Grinstead, RH19 4LZ (Mid Sussex) was dismissed on 4 June 2026 by Inspector CM Blair, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location for housing, having regard to local and national planning policy.
construction of a four-bedroom detached dwelling following demolition of outbuildings
- Authority
- Mid Sussex
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- CM Blair
- Postcode
- RH19 4LZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location for housing, having regard to local and national planning policy
- Whether the proposed development would be sustainably located
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of Ashwood Cottage, Hazeldene and Fieldways with particular regard to privacy
- The effect of the proposed development on flood risk
What decided it
The harm to the High Weald National Landscape and character and appearance of the surrounding area, combined with the failure to demonstrate compliance with flood risk policy and the unsuitability of the location for countryside development, outweighed the benefits of housing delivery.
The significant harms to the National Landscape, character and appearance, location suitability and flood risk, afforded significant weight individually and cumulatively, outweighed the moderate weight given to housing delivery and the moderate weight given to the sustainable rural location.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP6Policy DP12Policy DP15Policy DP16Policy DP26Policy DP41Policy EG1Policy EG2aPolicy EG5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 84Paragraph 173Paragraph 175Paragraph 189
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Sussex
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed29 October 202660151205, Dexter Drive, East Grinstead, RH19 4SU
- Dismissed22 October 2026601278111 Barnfield, Balcombe, RH17 6FW
- Dismissed9 October 20266010262Development Site At Former Tower Car Sales, Tower Close, East Grinstead, RH19 3BY
- Dismissed9 October 20266005209Lullings Cottage, West Hill, Ardingly, RH17 6QY
- Dismissed9 October 20266005206Lullings Cottage, West Hill, Ardingly, RH17 6QY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®