Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 April 20266003679

73, Maas Road, Birmingham, B31 2PP

Planning appeal 6003679 at 73, Maas Road, Birmingham, B31 2PP (Birmingham City Council) was dismissed on 14 April 2026 by Inspector Marley D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to internal space.

change of use from single dwelling house (Use Class C3) to 2no. self contained flats (Use Class C3) with associated external alterations to front and rear

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Marley D
Postcode
B31 2PP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to internal space
  • the effect of the proposal on the existing housing stock, with particular regard to whether the proposal would be acceptable with regards the loss of a family dwelling

What decided it

The proposed dwellings would fall significantly short of the minimum gross internal floor area required by the nationally described space standard and Policy DM10, resulting in unacceptably cramped internal layouts that would not meet the needs of future occupiers.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy PG3 of the Birmingham Development Plan 2017Policy TP30 of the Birmingham Development Plan 2017Policy TP35 of the Birmingham Development Plan 2017Policy DM10 of the Development Management in Birmingham Development Plan Document 2021Policy DM12 of the Development Management in Birmingham Development Plan Document 2021

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

23 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Birmingham City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266012986
    Land at the Rear of 79 Church Hill Road, Birmingham, B20 3PA
  2. Dismissed29 October 20266011902
    Wagamama, 51 Edgbaston Street, Birmingham, B5 4QL
  3. Dismissed27 October 20266013662
    22 Wash Lane, Birmingham, B25 8SB
  4. Dismissed22 October 20266015503
    60 Mildenhall Road, Great Barr, Birmingham, B42 2PQ
  5. Dismissed22 October 20266015146
    9Brittan Close, Birmingham, B34 7NB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.