Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 June 20266003851

Land at Grid Reference 461040 | 142783, West of the B3406, Preston Candover, RG25 2DU

Planning appeal 6003851 at Land at Grid Reference 461040 | 142783, West of the B3406, Preston Candover, RG25 2DU (Basingstoke and Deane) was dismissed on 9 June 2026 by Inspector Lewis Condé, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for residential development having regard to the adopted local development strategy and access to facilities and services.

erection of detached dwelling and garage; with associated parking, turning, landscaping, private amenity space and access

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
Lewis Condé
Postcode
RG25 2DU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for residential development having regard to the adopted local development strategy and access to facilities and services
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of heritage assets

What decided it

The proposal's location in unsustainable countryside outside the settlement boundary, combined with less-than-substantial harm to the setting of a designated heritage asset (Preston Candover Conservation Area), which provides a strong reason for refusal under Framework paragraph 11d), outweighs the modest socio-economic benefits of housing delivery.

The modest socio-economic benefits and biodiversity enhancements were outweighed by the conflict with the development plan, the unsustainable location requiring reliance on private car use, and the less-than-substantial harm to the setting of the Conservation Area and non-designated heritage asset, with the heritage harm providing a strong reason for refusal under the Framework

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SS1Policy SS6Policy CN9Policy SD1Policy EM1Policy EM10Policy EM11
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

4 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Basingstoke and Deane

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266011048
    Purdues Farm, Mortimer Lane, Fair Oak Green, Stratfield Saye, RG7 2DL
  2. Allowed26 October 20266007550
    75 Park Prewett Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9RG
  3. Dismissed20 October 20266011464
    Old Kiln House, Silchester Road, Tadley, RG263PX
  4. Dismissed13 October 20266011822
    Spindles, Winchester Road, Burghclere, RG20 9DX
  5. Dismissed13 October 20266011099
    Locksbridge Farm, Cufaude Lane, Bramley, RG26 5DL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.