Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 June 20266004074

Hawthorn Cottage, Guildford Road, Loxwood, RH140SF

Planning appeal 6004074 at Hawthorn Cottage, Guildford Road, Loxwood, RH140SF (Chichester) was dismissed on 18 June 2026 by Inspector Barry John Lomax, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would provide an appropriate mix of dwellings.

the demolition of 1 no. existing bungalow, garage and outbuilding and redevelopment of the site to provide 19 no. dwellings, associated access and landscaping

Authority
Chichester
Appeal type
major · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
Barry John Lomax
Postcode
RH14 0SF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would provide an appropriate mix of dwellings
  • the effect of the proposal on bats and the integrity of The Ebernoe Common SAC and The Mens SAC
  • whether the proposal makes adequate provision for the delivery of infrastructure and mitigation

What decided it

The absence of a dark landscape buffer/corridor along the north-east boundary would result in harm to bats and adversely affect the integrity of The Ebernoe Common SAC and The Mens SAC, which attracted substantial weight and could not be outweighed by the housing benefits.

The benefits of 19 market dwellings, economic benefits during construction and occupation, and suitable design (together attracting significant to moderate weight) were outweighed by the substantial harm from the absence of an acceptable dark landscape buffer/corridor affecting bat populations and SAC integrity, the failure to secure adequate planning obligations for infrastructure and mitigation, and the moderate harm from the inappropriate housing mix.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H5Policy NE6Policy H4Policy P15Policy T2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

30 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Chichester

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed23 October 20266009623
    Friars House, 52a East Street, Chichester, PO19 1JG
  2. Dismissed15 October 20266010948
    Pendrills, Mill Lane, Fishbourne, PO19 3JN
  3. Dismissed5 October 20266011850
    8 Gloucester Way, Chichester, PO19 5DL
  4. Dismissed2 October 20266011615
    1, Harberton Crescent, Chichester, PO19 5NY
  5. Allowed30 September 20266014666
    Lerryn, West Strand, West Wittering, Chichester, PO20 8AU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.