Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 June 20266004359

Land West Of Hermitage Gardens Accessed From Benwick Road, Doddington, PE15 0WL

Planning appeal 6004359 at Land West Of Hermitage Gardens Accessed From Benwick Road, Doddington, PE15 0WL (Fenland) was dismissed on 1 June 2026 by Inspector R Gee, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development upon character and appearance, having particular regard to the setting of the Doddington Conservation Area.

outline application for up to 37 dwellings and associated works including necessary sustainable drainage and open space

Authority
Fenland
Appeal type
major · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
R Gee
Postcode
PE15 0WL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development upon character and appearance, having particular regard to the setting of the Doddington Conservation Area

What decided it

The harm to the significance of the Doddington Conservation Area's setting, to which great weight must be given, was not outweighed by the modest public benefits of the scheme.

The identified harm to the setting of the Conservation Area, a designated heritage asset, disengaged the presumption in favour of sustainable development; the heritage harm and associated policy conflict would not be outweighed by the scheme's benefits, and the planning balance weighed against the proposal

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP16Policy LP18Policy LP3Policy LP12
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 206Paragraph 11
Judgments
Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWCH 2823 (Admin); Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

13 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Fenland

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266014701
    3 Oakley Close, Wisbech, PE13 2JZ
  2. Dismissed6 October 20266011868
    Land off Fen Road, Newton-in-the-isle, Wisbech, PE13 5HT
  3. Allowed1 October 20266002677
    Land East of Halfpenny Lane, Wisbech, PE14 0DQ
  4. Allowed25 September 20266008859
    Land South of The Elms, Chatteris, PE16 6JN
  5. Dismissed23 September 20266011235
    Land East Of 132 Cock Bank, Turves, PE7 2HN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.