Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 September 20266004363

Opposite 67 Sandgate Road, Folkestone, CT20 1RY

Planning appeal 6004363 at Opposite 67 Sandgate Road, Folkestone, CT20 1RY (Folkestone and Hythe District Council) was dismissed on 30 September 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposals on amenity, character and appearance with particular regard to the setting of the Folkestone Leas and Bayle Conservation Area.

proposed installation of 1no. new BT Street Hub, incorporating 2no. digital 75" LCD advert screens, and associated BT Phone Kiosk removals. Appeal B:

Authority
Folkestone and Hythe District Council
Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
advertisement
Postcode
CT20 1RY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposals on amenity, character and appearance with particular regard to the setting of the Folkestone Leas and Bayle Conservation Area

What decided it

The public benefits of the proposal are substantially outweighed by the adverse effects on character, appearance and the setting of the Conservation Area, with no clear justification for the identified harm.

Applying Policy S4, the benefits of approving the development are substantially outweighed by the adverse effects, as the proposal conflicts with Policy DP3 of the Framework which is a decision-making policy stating development should be refused where it fails to positively respond to context and integrate with heritage assets.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HB1Policy RL9Policy RL2
National Planning Policy Framework
Policy S4Policy DP3

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

106 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Folkestone and Hythe District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed30 September 20266004364
    Opposite 67 Sandgate Road, Folkestone, CT20 1RY
  2. Dismissed23 June 20266004361
    Opposite 114 Sandgate Road, Folkestone, CT20 2BW
  3. Dismissed23 June 20266004357
    Opposite 114 Sandgate Road, Folkestone, CT20 2BW
  4. Dismissed23 June 20266004353
    Opposite 137-139 Sandgate Road, Folkestone, CT20 2BL
  5. Dismissed23 June 20266004351
    Opposite 137-139 Sandgate Road, Folkestone, CT20 2BL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.