Planning appeal decision
Park Farm, Newport Road, Kingswood, Wolverhampton, WV7 3AJ
Planning appeal 6004390 at Park Farm, Newport Road, Kingswood, Wolverhampton, WV7 3AJ (South Staffordshire District Council) was allowed on 20 May 2026 by Inspector Edwards J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would represent inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
conversion of agricultural buildings to form 3 no dwellings and garages
- Authority
- South Staffordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Edwards J
- Postcode
- WV7 3AJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would represent inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- the effect on bats
- whether the development would be in a suitable location having regard to development plan policies, the National Planning Policy Framework and accessibility
- whether the development would be served by a safe and suitable access for all users
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the appeal site and the area
What decided it
The substantial shortfall in five-year housing land supply (0.89 years) engaged the tilted balance under Framework paragraph 11(d)(ii), and the benefits of housing delivery and building re-use outweighed the identified harms to location sustainability and rural character.
The benefits of housing delivery (moderate weight), effective re-use of buildings, minor economic benefits, and biodiversity enhancements (significant weight collectively) outweighed the moderate weight attached to harm from conflict with rural location and sustainability policies and the fairly localised visual effects on character and appearance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Core Strategy Core Policy 1Core Strategy Core Policy 4Core Strategy policy GB1Core Strategy policy EQ4Core Strategy policy EQ11Core Strategy policy EV6Core Strategy policy EV11Core Strategy policy EQ9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 83Paragraph 84Paragraph 115Paragraph 116Paragraph 125Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Staffordshire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed21 October 20266012641The Granary, Lyne Hill Lane, Penkridge, ST19 5NT
- Allowed25 September 20266010537Land to the Rear of 6-12 Long Lane, Newtown, Wolverhampton, WS6 6AU
- Dismissed23 September 20266008866The Paddocks, Bridgnorth Road, Stourton, DY7 6QZ
- Dismissed12 August 20266010048Hilton Colliery Farm Cottage, Red Lane, Essington, WV11 2RD
- Dismissed15 July 20266007394White Lodge, Old Stafford Road, Slade Heath, WV10 7PH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®