Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed20 April 20266004441

Pavement o/s Tesco, opposite 264 Park Road, Dingle, Liverpool, L8 4UE

the installation of 1no. BT Street Hub and removal of associated BT payphones

Authority
Liverpool City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Moulton E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Effect of the Hub on the character and appearance of the area
  • Effect of the Hub on highway safety, with particular regard to driver visibility and the pedestrian environment
  • Effect of the proposed advertisements on visual amenity
  • Effect of the proposed advertisements on public safety, with particular regard to the pedestrian environment

What decided it

The Hub's slender, modern design and replacement of existing telephone kiosks, combined with its set-back position and the generous remaining pavement width, meant it would not harm character and appearance or highway and pedestrian safety in this busy local centre context.

Plan policies cited: SP3, UD3, UD9, UD4, TP1, TP3, TP6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.