Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent to 25 Bickney Way, Fetcham, Surrey, KT22 9QQ
Planning appeal 6004497 at Land Adjacent to 25 Bickney Way, Fetcham, Surrey, KT22 9QQ (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 14 May 2026 by Inspector Everitt E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.
erection of a single storey 1 No bedroom dwelling and installation of dropped kerb to access new parking space
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Everitt E
- Postcode
- KT22 9QQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of occupiers of 54 and 56 Oswald Close, with regard to outlook
- whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, with regard to outdoor space
- whether the proposed development would satisfy the requirements of the statutory framework for biodiversity net gain
What decided it
The harmful effects on character and appearance and on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers outweighed the moderate benefits of housing supply and economic contribution.
the moderate benefits of housing supply and economic benefits did not outweigh the harmful effects on character and appearance and the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EN4Policy EN9Bookham and Fetcham Design Code
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mole Valley District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed27 October 20266010634The Garden House, School Lane, Mickleham, Dorking, RH5 6EW
- Dismissed27 October 202660036941 Ivy House Cottages, Partridge Lane, Newdigate, RH5 5BU
- Dismissed20 October 20266013764Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
- Dismissed19 October 20266011465Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
- Dismissed16 October 20266010203High Bank,, Mill Hill Lane, Betchworth, RH3 7LS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®