Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 May 20266004561

8 glenholme Heath, Halifax, West Yorkshire, HX1 4TH

the addition of a front and rear dormer and single storey rear extension

Authority
Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Mee K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surrounding area
  • the impact of the proposed single-storey rear extension on the living conditions of neighbouring residents, with particular regard to the impact on daylight at 10 Glenholme Heath

What decided it

The proposed front dormer and rear extension would cause material harm to the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area, and the rear extension would materially harm daylight to neighbouring residents, conflicting with the development plan with no material considerations to indicate otherwise.

Plan policies cited: Policy BT1, Policy BT2, Principle 2.10 of the Calderdale Placemaking and Design Supplementary Planning Document, Principle 3.3 of the Calderdale Placemaking and Design Supplementary Planning Document

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.