Planning appeal decision
Ayresfield, Ayres Lanes, Burghclare, Hampshire, RG20 9HG
Planning appeal 6004717 at Ayresfield, Ayres Lanes, Burghclare, Hampshire, RG20 9HG (Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council) was dismissed on 26 May 2026 by Inspector Standfield R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the surrounding area.
a detached dwellinghouse
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Standfield R
- Postcode
- RG20 9HG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- the suitability of the location for residential development having regard to local and national policy
What decided it
The adverse impacts of harm to character and appearance and unsustainability of location, combined with the status of the recently modified Neighbourhood Plan allocating sufficient housing, significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of providing a single dwelling in a location with no locally agreed need.
The significant harm to character and appearance and the unsuitability of the location for residential development, together with the status of the Neighbourhood Plan and NPPF policies on sustainable locations and well-designed places, significantly and demonstrably outweigh the relatively small benefits of housing provision, economic and social benefits, and renewable energy and biodiversity enhancements, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EM1Policy EM10Policy SD1Policy SS1Policy SS6Policy B1Policy B3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 12Paragraph 14
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Basingstoke and Deane
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed26 October 2026600755075 Park Prewett Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9RG
- Dismissed13 October 20266011822Spindles, Winchester Road, Burghclere, RG20 9DX
- Dismissed13 October 20266011099Locksbridge Farm, Cufaude Lane, Bramley, RG26 5DL
- Allowed10 July 20266004025Basingstoke Sports and Social Club, Fairfields Road, Basingstoke, RG21 3DR
- Allowed16 June 20266004924Newlyn House, North of West Ham Lane, Basingstoke, RG22 5EE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®