Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 May 20266004781

56 Harpenden Rd, London, SE27 0AF

Planning appeal 6004781 at 56 Harpenden Rd, London, SE27 0AF (London Borough of Lambeth) was dismissed on 22 May 2026 by Inspector Hunter A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The proposed housing mix, with particular regard to the provision of family sized accommodation.

the dwelling is a House in Multiple Occupation and the proposal is for a change of use into 4 flats

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Hunter A
Postcode
SE27 0AF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The proposed housing mix, with particular regard to the provision of family sized accommodation
  • Whether future occupiers would have satisfactory living conditions, with particular regard to the size of the accommodation; internal storage provision, and private amenity space
  • Whether a planning obligation in respect of car free development; cycle hire membership, and car club membership would be reasonable and necessary to make the proposed development acceptable

What decided it

The proposed development conflicts with the development plan taken as a whole, particularly regarding housing mix (lack of family-sized accommodation), living conditions of future occupiers (undersized units, insufficient storage and amenity space), and the absence of a planning obligation to secure car-free development and car club membership.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H6Policy H5Policy T6Policy D6Policy T3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

423 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Lambeth

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed16 October 20266009699
    28 Amesbury Avenue, Lambeth, London, SW2 3AA
  2. Dismissed9 September 20266007861
    The Park, 56 Elder Road, West Norwood, London, SE27 9ND
  3. Dismissed11 August 20266009353
    62A Upper Tulse Hill, London, SW2 2RW
  4. Dismissed23 July 20266005770
    Pavement O/S 44 Clapham High Street, London, SW4 7UR
  5. Dismissed23 July 20266005768
    Pavement O/S 44 Clapham High Street, London, SW4 7UR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.