Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 August 20266004859

Cotters Hill Farm, Bug Hill, Woldingham, CR3 7LB

erection of single storey office building (Class E)

Authority
Tandridge District Council
Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
employment-industrial
Postcode
CR3 7LB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposed development on biodiversity
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial harm to the Green Belt through inappropriateness and loss of openness, combined with unacceptable biodiversity effects and modest benefits that do not clearly outweigh the harm, means very special circumstances do not exist to justify the development.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt and other harms were not clearly outweighed by the modest economic and social benefits, so the balance did not favour the development.

Framework references: 154

Plan policies cited: Policy DP10, Policy DP13, Policy CP22

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.