Planning appeal decision
77 Long Street, Middleton, M24 6UN
- Authority
- Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- leisure-sport
- Postcode
- M24 6UN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area bearing in mind the special attention that should be paid to the desirability of preserving the special interest of the adjacent Grade II* listed building, known as Long Street Methodist Church Long Street Methodist Sunday School, and the extent to which it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Middleton Town Centre Conservation Area
- highway safety with respect to pedestrian access and movement within the site
- the living conditions of nearby residents with respect to noise and air quality
- protected species with respect to badgers
What decided it
The potential direct harm to the fabric of the adjacent Grade II* listed building from the proximity of the ramp and lack of construction detail, combined with the failure to provide safe pedestrian access, inadequate noise and air quality assessments, and absence of a badger survey, collectively outweighed the economic and regeneration benefits of the scheme.
The substantial weight given to potential harm to the Grade II* listed building, substantial weight to harm to living conditions of residents from noise and air quality impacts, significant weight to lack of safe pedestrian access, and moderate weight to potential harm to badgers outweighed the substantial weight given to economic benefits and reuse of vacant building, resulting in dismissal of the appeal.
Plan policies cited: Policy P2 of the Rochdale Core Strategy (2016), Policy JP-S1 of the Places for Everyone Joint Development Plan (2024), Policy DM1 of the Rochdale Core Strategy, Policy P3 of the Rochdale Core Strategy, Policy JP-G1 of the Places for Everyone Joint Development Plan, Policy T2 of the Rochdale Core Strategy, Policy JP-C8 of the Places for Everyone Joint Development Plan, Policy G9 of the Rochdale Core Strategy, Policy JP-S5 of the Places for Everyone Joint Development Plan, Policy DM2 of the Rochdale Core Strategy, Policy G7 of the Rochdale Core Strategy, Policy JP-G8 of the Places for Everyone Joint Development Plan, Policy SO2 of the Rochdale Core Strategy, Policy C6 of the Rochdale Core Strategy, Policy C8 of the Rochdale Core Strategy
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®