Planning appeal decision
Department of Work and Pensions Dcs Distribution Centre, Manchester Road, Heywood, OL10 2PZ
Planning appeal 3346477 at Department of Work and Pensions Dcs Distribution Centre, Manchester Road, Heywood, OL10 2PZ (Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council) was allowed on 7 November 2024 by Inspector Webb B, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effects of the development on the living conditions of occupants of dwellings within Oldbury Close, Bader Drive and Whitehouse Close, and future occupants of dwellings within the North of Harehills Road Phase of the South Heywood Masterplan in relation to outlook, visual amenity, and noise.
redevelopment of the site comprising the demolition of all existing logistics units and erection of new storage and distribution units (Use Class B8) with ancillary office space, vehicular, pedestrian and cycle access, external yards, parking, landscaping and associated works
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- employment-industrial · Major general industry/storage/warehousing
- Inspector
- Webb B
- Postcode
- OL10 2PZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effects of the development on the living conditions of occupants of dwellings within Oldbury Close, Bader Drive and Whitehouse Close, and future occupants of dwellings within the North of Harehills Road Phase of the South Heywood Masterplan in relation to outlook, visual amenity, and noise
- the effects of the development on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The Inspector concluded that the development would not cause unacceptable harm to neighbouring or future residents' living conditions or to the character and appearance of the area, and would comply with the development plan as a whole, with noise impacts capable of being controlled by condition to a standard better than the realistic fallback use of the site.
the finding that the development plan was complied with as a whole was not outweighed by any other considerations, so the appeal was allowed
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM1Policy P3Policy G9Policy JP-G7Policy JP-P1Policy G8Policy JP-S4Policy JP-Strat6Policy JP-Strat7JPA 1.1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 193
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed2 September 2026600497777 Long Street, Middleton, M24 6UN
- Allowed30 July 20266005921Hollingworth Heights, Peanock Lane, Littleborough, OL15 0AD
- Dismissed29 October 2025336911111 South Parade, Rochdale, OL16 1LR
- Allowed11 September 20253358849Rainshore House Over Town Lane, Rochdale, OL12 7TQ
- Dismissed4 September 20253356528Summit View Cabin, Salley Street, Calderbank Road, Littleborough, OL15 9NG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®