Planning appeal decision
Low Beck, Kings Cross Road, South Nutfield, RH1 5NJ
Planning appeal 6005000 at Low Beck, Kings Cross Road, South Nutfield, RH1 5NJ (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 18 June 2026 by Inspector S Simms, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
the construction of a four bedroom detached dwelling
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- S Simms
- Postcode
- RH1 5NJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with regard to privacy
- the effect of the proposed development on the health and value of nearby protected trees
- whether the site is suitable for the proposed development, having regard to its accessibility to services and facilities
What decided it
The combination of potentially avoidable impacts—harm to protected trees and lack of safe and suitable pedestrian access—significantly and demonstrably outweighs the housing benefits, even in the context of unmet housing need.
Despite the contribution to housing supply in view of the shortage of land and a small boost to the local economy during construction, the adverse impacts of harm to protected trees and lack of safe pedestrian access significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, so the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CSP18 of the Tandridge District Core Strategy 2008Policy DP7 of the Tandridge Local Plan Part 2: Detailed Policies 2014Policy DP5 of the Tandridge Local Plan Part 2: Detailed Policies 2014
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 232Paragraph 115Paragraph 117Paragraph 136Paragraph 11Paragraph 135
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed26 October 2026601413931a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
- Dismissed15 October 20266005184Streathbourne House, 75 Redehall Road, Smallfield, RH6 9QA
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®