®Planning appeal decision
276 Mancroft Road and Land to the Rear of 262 to 268 Mancroft Road, Aley Green, Luton, LU1 4DR
Planning appeal 6005035 at 276 Mancroft Road and Land to the Rear of 262 to 268 Mancroft Road, Aley Green, Luton, LU1 4DR (Central Bedfordshire Council) was dismissed on 4 June 2026 by Inspector L Fern, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is suitable for the proposal regarding location, land use and amount of development, specifically: whether it would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt and the effect on openness; the effect on character and appearance; the effect on highway safety; and whether harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations to amount to very special circumstances.
Permission in Principle (PiP) for the creation of a new access road and the erection of between 4 and 9 new dwellings following demolition of an existing detached dwelling
- Authority
- Central Bedfordshire Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- L Fern
- Postcode
- LU1 4DR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is suitable for the proposal regarding location, land use and amount of development, specifically: whether it would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt and the effect on openness; the effect on character and appearance; the effect on highway safety; and whether harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations to amount to very special circumstances
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt with substantial harm to openness and character, and the absence of very special circumstances to justify it means the Green Belt protection at NPPF paragraph 11(d)(i) provides a strong reason for refusal that outweighs the housing land supply deficit.
The substantial weight afforded to Green Belt harm and loss of openness, together with harm to character and appearance, was not outweighed by the limited benefits of housing supply contribution, church parking provision, public footpath widening, and economic benefits, such that very special circumstances do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP4Policy HQ1Policy HQ8Policy EE4Policy EE5Policy T2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 153Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in Central Bedfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed15 September 20266007334Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
- Allowed4 September 202660072022 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
- Dismissed7 August 20266007254Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ
- Dismissed10 July 20266005439263 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, LU3 3PP
- Dismissed8 July 20266007697142 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, Luton, LU3 3PS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.