Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 June 20266005035

276 Mancroft Road and Land to the rear of 262 to 268 Mancroft Road, Aley Green, Luton, LU1 4DR

Permission in Principle (PiP) for the creation of a new access road and the erection of between 4 and 9 new dwellings following demolition of an existing detached dwelling

Authority
Central Bedfordshire Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
LU1 4DR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site is suitable for the proposal regarding location, land use and amount of development, specifically: whether it would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt and the effect on openness; the effect on character and appearance; the effect on highway safety; and whether harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations to amount to very special circumstances

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt with substantial harm to openness and character, and the absence of very special circumstances to justify it means the Green Belt protection at NPPF paragraph 11(d)(i) provides a strong reason for refusal that outweighs the housing land supply deficit.

The substantial weight afforded to Green Belt harm and loss of openness, together with harm to character and appearance, was not outweighed by the limited benefits of housing supply contribution, church parking provision, public footpath widening, and economic benefits, such that very special circumstances do not exist.

Framework references: 11, 153, 155

Plan policies cited: Policy SP4, Policy HQ1, Policy HQ8, Policy EE4, Policy EE5, Policy T2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.