Planning appeal decision
Blossom Hill Stables, Mill Lane, Kingsley, WA6 8JA
Planning appeal 6005098 at Blossom Hill Stables, Mill Lane, Kingsley, WA6 8JA (Cheshire West and Chester Council) was dismissed on 23 June 2026 by Inspector MG Garrard, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site is suitable for residential development having regard to its location, land use and amount of development, with particular regard to whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt and its effect on openness.
application for a stage 1 permission in principle for the erection of between 0- 1 dwellings on land at Mill Lane, Kingsley WA6 8JA
- Authority
- Cheshire West and Chester Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- MG Garrard
- Postcode
- WA6 8JA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the site is suitable for residential development having regard to its location, land use and amount of development, with particular regard to whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt and its effect on openness
- Whether the site is appropriate for the development having regard to the countryside location and its accessibility to services and facilities
What decided it
The site's poor accessibility to services and facilities and location outside the settlement hierarchy, combined with high car dependency, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest housing supply benefits of a single dwelling.
The adverse impacts of poor accessibility, countryside location contrary to spatial strategy, and high car dependency significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefits of housing supply contribution, economic benefits from construction, and support for rural services, despite the tilted balance applying due to lack of five-year housing land supply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy STRAT1Policy STRAT2Policy STRAT9Policy DM19Policy R1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 83Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cheshire West and Chester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed21 October 20266013998Holly Cottage, Post Office Lane, Norley, WA6 8NB
- Dismissed16 October 20266012737Smoker Brook Barn, Linnards Lane, Wincham, CW9 6ED
- Dismissed6 October 20266011029Oaktree, Liverpool Road, Neston, CH64 3RQ
- Dismissed10 September 20266005497Manor House Farm, Hillfoot Lane, Kingsley, Frodsham, WA6 6TB
- Dismissed10 September 20266005495Manor House Farm, Hillfoot Lane, Kingsley, Frodsham, WA6 6TB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®