Planning appeal decision
35 Denmark Road, Poole, BH15 2DE
Planning appeal 6005194 at 35 Denmark Road, Poole, BH15 2DE (Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole) was dismissed on 17 August 2026 by Inspector D R Kay, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to local and national planning policy.
Outline planning permission with all matters reserved for the demolition of existing workshop / store and re-development of the site with 9 flats
- Authority
- Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- D R Kay
- Postcode
- BH15 2DE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to local and national planning policy
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the local area, having particular regard to the significance of heritage assets
- whether the development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers and the effect of the development on the living conditions of occupiers of existing neighbouring properties with regard to overlooking and privacy
- the effect of the proposal on international and nationally designated sites of importance for biodiversity
What decided it
The likely significant effect on protected European Habitat Sites, combined with unjustified harm to the conservation area setting and unacceptable living conditions, provided strong reasons for refusal that engaged the exception to the presumption in favour of sustainable development under Framework paragraph 11(d)(ii).
The moderate public benefits of 9 dwellings in the context of a 2.1-year housing land supply were insufficient to outweigh the less than substantial harm to the conservation area, and were overridden by the strong reasons for refusal arising from likely significant effects on protected habitat sites and harm to heritage assets, which engaged the exception to the presumption in favour of sustainable development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy PP2Policy PP27Policy PP28Policy PP32Policy PP34Policy PP35Policy PP39
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 135Paragraph 195Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed28 October 20266010210Parkside Guesthouse, 24 Southcote Road, Bournemouth, BH1 3SR
- Allowed22 October 2026601305116 Riverside Lane, Bournemouth, BH6 3LD
- Dismissed19 October 20266005901Flat 5, 11 Alyth Road Talbot Woods, Bournemouth, BH3 7DF
- Dismissed15 October 202660067416 Park Place, Poole, BH14 0LY
- Dismissed14 October 2026601138341 Shillito Road, Poole, BH12 2BW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®