Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 August 20266005605

58 and 60 Greswell Street, Fulham, London, SW6 6PP

the creation of a single dwelling from two apartments, basement extension with lightwells to front and rear, two storey side extension to front, single storey extension to side and rear at ground floor, second floor rear extension, installation of rooflights and dormer and installation of front mansard to roof level with three dormer windows

Authority
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
SW6 6PP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, bearing in mind it would be in the Crabtree Conservation Area and nearby to a Grade II listed building
  • Flood risk

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the designated heritage assets, to which great weight must be given under the Framework, was not outweighed by any public benefits, and the inadequate Flood Risk Assessment failed to demonstrate acceptable flood risk mitigation.

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the designated heritage assets, to which great weight must be given, was not outweighed by the modest time-limited economic benefits from construction, and no public benefits were demonstrated

Plan policies cited: Policy DC1, Policy DC4, Policy DC8, Policy CC3, Policy DC11

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.