Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 July 20266005752

Land Opposite 78 Whiteways Grove, Sheffield, S4 8FL

Planning appeal 6005752 at Land Opposite 78 Whiteways Grove, Sheffield, S4 8FL (Sheffield City Council) was dismissed on 9 July 2026 by Inspector MG Garrard, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on living conditions of future occupiers with particular regard to external space and existing occupiers with particular regard to privacy and the availability of natural light.

1 No. 3 bedroom, detached single dwelling house

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
MG Garrard
Postcode
S4 8FL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on living conditions of future occupiers with particular regard to external space and existing occupiers with particular regard to privacy and the availability of natural light
  • highway safety with particular regard to access and parking
  • biodiversity net gain and protected species
  • the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The combined harm to living conditions, highway safety, and failure to satisfy statutory biodiversity net gain and protected species requirements significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest housing supply benefits.

The benefits of housing supply and modest economic benefits were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the adverse impacts on living conditions, highway safety, and breach of statutory biodiversity and protected species requirements.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H14Policy H15Policy BE9Policy BE5Policy GE11Policy CS74
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

54 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Sheffield City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed7 September 20266011059
    41 Springfield Road, Sheffield, S7 2GE
  2. Allowed21 July 20266004273
    Site Of Former 27 Skew Hill, Sheffield, S35 8QW
  3. Dismissed10 July 20266007531
    Kingfield Lodge, 22 Kingfield Road, Sheffield, S11 9AS
  4. Dismissed10 December 20253372713
    54 Norton Lees Lane, Sheffield, S8 9BE
  5. Allowed4 December 20253368003
    Dore and Totley Tennis Club, 48 Devonshire Road, Sheffield, S17 3NW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.