Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 July 20266005799

69A, St Margarets Road, Twickenham, TW12LL

Planning appeal 6005799 at 69A, St Margarets Road, Twickenham, TW12LL (Richmond upon Thames) was dismissed on 21 July 2026 by Inspector D Marley, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on existing housing stock.

described on the application form as “Demolition of existing external staircase and first floor conservatory and construction of new single story rear extension. Internal reconfiguration general refurbishment to include new staircase to connect lower grou nd and ground floor as duplex unit

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
D Marley
Postcode
TW1 2LL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on existing housing stock

What decided it

The net loss of one dwelling and reduced density of the site, contrary to the development plan's protection of existing housing stock and the Government's objective of significantly boosting housing supply, could not be offset by the energy efficiency, accessibility and appearance benefits offered.

The substantial harm to housing stock and conflict with the development plan's housing objectives, when assessed against the Framework as a whole under the tilted balance, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of energy efficiency improvements, accessibility for disabled occupiers, and minor appearance gains.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H8 of the London Plan 2021Policy 14 of the Richmond upon Thames Local Plan 'The best for our borough' (2024 to 2039) (2025)Policy H1 of the London PlanPolicy 13 of the Local Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 8

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

467 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266015879
    88 Colne Road, Twickenham, TW2 6QE
  2. Dismissed28 October 20266015836
    64 First Avenue, Mortlake, London, SW14 8SR
  3. Dismissed26 October 20266011874
    61-63 Petersham Road, Richmond Upon Thames, TW10 6UT
  4. Dismissed20 October 20266010388
    163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ
  5. Dismissed19 October 20266013760
    Pavement Os, 53-57 High Street, Whitton, TW2 7LB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.