Planning appeal decision
Barn at 717 487 (Clarks Barn), Loddiswell, Kingsbridge, TQ7 4EL
Planning appeal 6005902 at Barn at 717 487 (Clarks Barn), Loddiswell, Kingsbridge, TQ7 4EL (South Hams) was allowed on 14 August 2026 by Inspector E Worley, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development would be in a suitable location, with particular regard to the development strategy.
the change of use and alterations of barn to create dwelling. Alterations to agricultural access for residential use. Creation of parking area. Installation of foul and surface drainage. Landscaping of site with fence erected around the curtilage
- Authority
- South Hams
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- E Worley
- Postcode
- TQ7 4EL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the development would be in a suitable location, with particular regard to the development strategy
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposed development on best and most versatile agricultural land
What decided it
The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply triggered the presumption in favour of sustainable development under NPPF paragraph 11, which outweighed the conflicts with the development plan.
The adverse impacts of granting permission, comprising conflict with the spatial strategy (afforded moderate weight), moderate harm to character and appearance (limited by scale and localised views), and undemonstrated loss of best and most versatile agricultural land (limited weight given negligible impact on farming), did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of housing supply contribution and retention of a building of historic interest when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SPT1Policy SPT2Policy TTV1Policy TTV26(2)Policy DEV23Policy DEV32
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Hams
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed27 October 20266014394Baidland, Downs Road, Thurlestone, TQ7 3NF
- Dismissed22 October 20266013915East View, Crescent Road, Ivybridge, PL21 0BP
- Allowed13 October 20266009730Airwaves Solutions Limited, DAC157, Communication Station, Road From Bolberry to Waterfern, Bolberry, TQ7 3DY
- Allowed13 October 20266009219Land at Chipple Park, Lutton, Ivybridge, PL21 9TA
- Dismissed7 October 20266006171Hazel Paddock, Land At Sx 774 389, East Portlemouth, Salcombe, TQ8 8PA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®