Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed10 August 20266006033

31 Stevens Lane, Claygate, Esher, KT10 0TD

Planning appeal 6006033 at 31 Stevens Lane, Claygate, Esher, KT10 0TD (Elmbridge Borough Council) was allowed on 10 August 2026 by Inspector Thomas Courtney, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to trees.

a detached two-storey house with rooms in the roofspace and a pair of semi-detached two-storey houses with rooms in the roofspace, new vehicular access to No 31 from Raymond Way, conversion of garage to habitable accommodation with elevational changes

Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
Thomas Courtney
Postcode
KT10 0TD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to trees

What decided it

The benefits of the scheme, most notably its contribution to housing supply and the effective use of land in a sustainable location, are considerable and attract significant weight, and when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole, the adverse impacts do not significantly and demonstrably outweigh those benefits.

The moderate harm arising from conflict with the development plan (loss of the oak tree and impact on character and appearance) was outweighed by the significant benefits of the scheme, particularly the contribution to housing supply and effective use of land, assessed against the Framework policies as a whole under the tilted balance.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS17 of the Elmbridge Core StrategyPolicy DM2 of the Elmbridge Local PlanPolicy DM6 of the Elmbridge Local Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 124Paragraph 136Paragraph 73

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

135 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed6 October 20266010653
    Land Rear Of 12-14 New Road, Esher, KT10 9PG
  2. Allowed3 September 20266007869
    Wild Flowers, Wren's Hill, Oxshott, KT22 0HN
  3. Allowed9 July 20266005552
    1a Carmalt Gardens, Hersham, KT12 5HQ
  4. Dismissed28 May 20266005939
    Nicholson House, 41 Thames Street, Weybridge, KT13 8JG
  5. Allowed27 May 20266004412
    The Warren, Cedar Road, Cobham, Surrey, KT11 2AE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.