Planning appeal decision
Land at Low Road / Fox Lane, North Tuddenham, Norfolk, NR20 3DH
Planning appeal 6006371 at Land at Low Road / Fox Lane, North Tuddenham, Norfolk, NR20 3DH (Breckland District Council) was dismissed on 22 July 2026 by Inspector Simon Rawle, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area including the impact any future visibility splays would have on existing mature hedgerows.
for the development of up to 7 self-build dwellings (all matters reserved)
- Authority
- Breckland District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- Simon Rawle
- Postcode
- NR20 3DH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area including the impact any future visibility splays would have on existing mature hedgerows
- Whether or not the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed dwellings having regard to development plan policies relating to development within the countryside, including whether or not there is an adequate mechanism to secure the provision of self-build dwellings at the appeal site
- Whether adequate information has been provided to determine whether or not the proposal would unacceptably harm protected species
- The effect of the proposal on highway safety
- Whether adequate information has been provided to determine whether or not the proposal would result in an unacceptable flood risk
What decided it
The unacceptable harm to character and appearance caused by introducing residential development into open countryside that makes a significant contribution to the rural scene, combined with the location being inappropriate under development plan policies and inadequate ecological information, outweighed the housing benefits.
The benefits of up to seven dwellings including two affordable units and self-build provision, afforded high-side moderate weight, were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance, the inappropriate location contrary to development plan policies, and inadequate ecological information.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GEN 01Policy GEN 02Policy GEN 03Policy GEN 05Policy COM 01Policy ENV 02Policy ENV 05Policy ENV 09Policy HOU 03Policy HOU 05Policy TR 01Policy TR 02
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
- Judgments
- Finney v Welsh Ministers [2019] EWCA Civ 1868
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Breckland Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed22 October 20266007693Fallowfield, Northacre, Caston, NR17 1DG
- Allowed16 October 20266007250Land To The West Of Daffodil Drive, Norwich Road, Besthorpe, Norwich, NR17 2LA
- Dismissed14 October 20266011427Land at Clay Hall Lane, Blo' Norton, IP22 2HZ
- Dismissed3 August 20266006889Willow Farm,, Elsing Road, North Tuddenham, NR20 3DS
- Dismissed3 August 20266006886Willow Farm,, Elsing Road, North Tuddenham, NR20 3DS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®