Planning appeal decision
Units 5-9 Selly Oak Industrial Estate, Elliott Road, Selly Oak, Birmingham, B29 6LR
Planning appeal 6006688 at Units 5-9 Selly Oak Industrial Estate, Elliott Road, Selly Oak, Birmingham, B29 6LR (Birmingham City Council) was allowed on 1 July 2026 by Inspector B Plenty, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the condition, or a modified version, would remain reasonable and necessary.
the “Variation of conditions 1 (approved plans), 17 (arboricultural method statement), 19 (construction environment management plan) and 20 (construction method statement) attached to approval 2020/00376/PA to incorporate phasing plans and enable phased discharge of conditions” (which related to the erection of a block of purpose built student accommodation containing 523 bed spaces) without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 2022/08427/PA, dated 5/1/23
- Authority
- Birmingham City Council
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- other
- Inspector
- B Plenty
- Postcode
- B29 6LR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the condition, or a modified version, would remain reasonable and necessary
What decided it
The deletion of the affordability requirement (criterion g) was justified because it was imprecise, not a planning requirement under either Policy TP11 or the NPPF, and unreasonably restricted the condition to a single operator, whereas the condition should focus on securing replacement gymnastics use rather than exclusive provision for the current operator.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy TP11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Birmingham City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed29 October 20266012986Land at the Rear of 79 Church Hill Road, Birmingham, B20 3PA
- Dismissed29 October 20266011902Wagamama, 51 Edgbaston Street, Birmingham, B5 4QL
- Dismissed27 October 2026601366222 Wash Lane, Birmingham, B25 8SB
- Dismissed22 October 2026601550360 Mildenhall Road, Great Barr, Birmingham, B42 2PQ
- Dismissed22 October 202660151469Brittan Close, Birmingham, B34 7NB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®