Planning appeal decision
2 Queens Court, Eaton Socon, St Neots, PE19 8BZ
erection of two x two-bedroom homes and associated works
- Authority
- Huntingdonshire
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Postcode
- PE19 8BZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The absence of a five-year housing land supply and the application of the tilted balance under NPPF paragraph 11(d), which accorded significant weight to the housing benefits and made effective use of land, outweighed the significant weight given to the harm to character and appearance and conflict with the development plan.
Significant weight was given to the harm to character and appearance and conflict with the development plan; significant weight was accorded to the benefits of housing delivery, effective use of land, and sustainability, with great weight to the windfall site benefits, resulting in the adverse impacts not significantly and demonstrably outweighing the benefits under the Framework as a whole.
Framework references: 11, 140
Plan policies cited: Policy LP11, Policy LP12, Policy LP7, Policy A3, Policy LP4
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®