Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed13 July 20266006941

2 Queens Court, Eaton Socon, St Neots, PE19 8BZ

Planning appeal 6006941 at 2 Queens Court, Eaton Socon, St Neots, PE19 8BZ (Huntingdonshire) was allowed on 13 July 2026 by Inspector MG Garrard, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

erection of two x two-bedroom homes and associated works

Authority
Huntingdonshire
Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
MG Garrard
Postcode
PE19 8BZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The absence of a five-year housing land supply and the application of the tilted balance under NPPF paragraph 11(d), which accorded significant weight to the housing benefits and made effective use of land, outweighed the significant weight given to the harm to character and appearance and conflict with the development plan.

Significant weight was given to the harm to character and appearance and conflict with the development plan; significant weight was accorded to the benefits of housing delivery, effective use of land, and sustainability, with great weight to the windfall site benefits, resulting in the adverse impacts not significantly and demonstrably outweighing the benefits under the Framework as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP11Policy LP12Policy LP7Policy A3Policy LP4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 140

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

50 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Huntingdonshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed28 August 20266009938
    Bulls Head Public House, 96 Cambridge Street, St.Neots, PE19 1PJ
  2. Dismissed1 July 20266005127
    A J Farm, Fenside Road, Warboys, PE28 2UW
  3. Allowed29 August 20253363835
    Land at Folly Farm Livery Stable, London Road, Yaxley, Cambridgeshire, PE7 3NQ
  4. Dismissed11 April 20253355275
    Yard 2 At Ashley Lodge Conquest Drove, Farcet, Cambs , PE7 3DH
  5. Dismissed18 March 20253349913
    Land Between 14 And 16 Coneygear Road, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, PE29 1QL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.