Planning appeal decision
Frogs Leap, Clayhough Lane, Church Laneham, DN22 0NJ
Planning appeal 6007065 at Frogs Leap, Clayhough Lane, Church Laneham, DN22 0NJ (Bassetlaw) was dismissed on 14 August 2026 by Inspector J Smith, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area.
erection of residential lodge
- Authority
- Bassetlaw
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- J Smith
- Postcode
- DN22 0NJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area
- whether the proposal would preserve the setting of a Grade II Listed building
- the effect of the development on the significance of a non-designated heritage asset
- whether the proposed development would promote sustainable travel and its effect upon highway safety
- whether the proposed development would be located within a suitable location
- whether the requirements in relation to Biodiversity Net Gain have been satisfied
- the effect upon the living conditions upon the residents of 'Frogs Leap', with specific regard to the effect upon the available private amenity space of this neighbouring property and its effect upon privacy
What decided it
The failure to demonstrate compliance with the statutory requirement for 10% Biodiversity Net Gain under Schedule 7A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, which is a matter that cannot be deferred to a pre-commencement condition and must be addressed at the application stage.
The benefits of providing accommodation for an individual with an established disability-related need and the private funding of the development, which were afforded limited weight, did not overcome the statutory requirement for 10% Biodiversity Net Gain and the multiple conflicts with the development plan including harm to character and appearance, heritage significance, and poor accessibility to sustainable transport.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy ST33Policy ST35Policy ST40Policy ST41Policy ST53Policy ST1Policy ST2Policy ST38Policy 46
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 116Paragraph 216
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bassetlaw
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed14 October 20266013155Westmoor, Retford Road, North Wheatley, DN22 9DU
- Dismissed22 September 20266006950Land off Middlebridge Road, Gringley-on-the-Hill, DN10 4SE
- Dismissed16 September 20266007348Home Farm, Main Road, Bevercotes, NG22 0PS
- Dismissed10 September 202660122281 Pembroke Drive, Carlton in Lindrick, S81 9DW
- Allowed1 September 20266007837Land South of Cave's Lane, Walkeringham, Doncaster, DN10 4LU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®