Planning appeal decision
Angel's Field, Swarthdale, Birkland Barrow Road, Nether Kellet, LA6 1FJ
Planning appeal 6007131 at Angel's Field, Swarthdale, Birkland Barrow Road, Nether Kellet, LA6 1FJ (Lancaster City Council) was dismissed on 14 August 2026 by Inspector Sarah Manchester, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the location is suitable for the proposed development.
part retrospective application for the change of use of agricultural land to touring caravan site, creation of areas of hardstanding for the storage of caravans/to site mobile toilet/shower facility block, construction of tracks, siting of 3 wagon bodies for storage and the installation of a package treatment plant
- Authority
- Lancaster City Council
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- leisure-sport
- Inspector
- Sarah Manchester
- Postcode
- LA6 1FJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the location is suitable for the proposed development
- The effect on the character and appearance of the countryside
- Whether the proposal would be compatible with neighbouring uses, with particular regard to noise and odour
- Whether the proposal would increase the risk of surface water flooding
What decided it
The proposal conflicts with the development plan as a whole on grounds of unsuitable location, harm to rural character and appearance, and unacceptable amenity impacts from neighbouring intensive poultry units, with no material considerations sufficient to outweigh these conflicts.
The limited public benefits in terms of visitor economy and biodiversity were insufficient to outweigh the harm to rural character and appearance, the unsuitability of the location in terms of accessibility and sustainability, and the unacceptable amenity impacts from neighbouring intensive poultry operations.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM47Policy DM52Policy DM60Policy EN3Policy DM29Policy DM46Policy DM34Policy DM36Policy DM57
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 182
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Lancaster City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed27 October 20266012921Land Off Deer Park Lane, Hornby, Lancaster, LA2 8LF
- Allowed12 August 20266007210Land at Arna Wood Lane, Aldcliffe, LA2 0AE
- Dismissed29 July 2026600804730 Market Street, Carnforth, LA5 9JX
- Dismissed17 June 20266006041Appletree Basin, Quernmore Brow, Lancaster, LA2 0QP
- Allowed11 June 20266006298Land at Back Lane, Borwick, LA6 1JT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®