Planning appeal decision
Land at Arna Wood Lane, Aldcliffe, LA2 0AE
Planning appeal 6007210 at Land at Arna Wood Lane, Aldcliffe, LA2 0AE (Lancaster City Council) was allowed on 12 August 2026 by Inspector Graham Wraight, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is suitably located, having regard to local and national planning policies and to the accessibility to services and facilities.
the change of use of agricultural land and retention of gypsy/traveller pitch including hardstanding, mobile home, sewage treatment plant, associated access and parking and erection of a dayroom building
- Authority
- Lancaster City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy
- Inspector
- Graham Wraight
- Postcode
- LA2 0AE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development is suitably located, having regard to local and national planning policies and to the accessibility to services and facilities
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area and the landscape
- Whether the development would provide an acceptable means of foul and surface water disposal
- The weight to be attached to other considerations, including the need and supply of Gypsy & Traveller sites; the availability (or lack) of alternative sites; the personal circumstances of the occupiers including the best interests of children; the Planning Policy for Traveller sites; and the presumption in favour of sustainable development set out by the National Planning Policy Framework
What decided it
The substantial weight attached to the unmet need for Gypsy and Traveller pitches, the lack of alternative sites and the Council's longstanding policy failure outweighed the limited harm to character and appearance and the conflict with the development plan's locational policy.
The substantial benefits of meeting unmet Gypsy and Traveller need, the lack of alternative sites, policy failure and the appellant's personal circumstances outweighed the limited harm to character and appearance, the conflict with Policy DM9's locational requirements, and the limited weight against intentional unauthorised development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM9Policy DM4Policy SP2Policy DM29Policy DM46Policy EN3Policy ASNP3Policy DM34Policy DM35Policy ASNP8
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Lancaster City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed27 October 20266012921Land Off Deer Park Lane, Hornby, Lancaster, LA2 8LF
- Notice varied and upheld23 September 20263378663Land Lying to the North of Bottomdale Road, Halton, Lancashire, LA2 6BH
- Dismissed14 August 20266007131Angel's Field, Swarthdale, Birkland Barrow Road, Nether Kellet, LA6 1FJ
- Dismissed17 June 20266006041Appletree Basin, Quernmore Brow, Lancaster, LA2 0QP
- Allowed11 June 20266006298Land at Back Lane, Borwick, LA6 1JT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®