Planning appeal decision
Kingsholm Inn, 8-10 Kingsholm Road, Gloucester, GL1 3AT
Planning appeal 6007149 at Kingsholm Inn, 8-10 Kingsholm Road, Gloucester, GL1 3AT (Gloucester City) was dismissed on 28 July 2026 by Inspector J J Evans, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the scheme upon the character and appearance of the area.
the “erection of two-storey detached building to the rear of the Kingsholm Inn to provide 3 no 1 bed flats. Change of use of part of ground floor of public house to Class E and reconfiguration of ground floor to provide new toilet facilities; alterations to existing flats including extensions to provide 6 no 1 bed flats (ie 1 no additional). Associated external alterations mainly to rear and sides of the building including new stair / access core
- Authority
- Gloucester City
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- J J Evans
- Postcode
- GL1 3AT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the scheme upon the character and appearance of the area
- the effect upon the living conditions of nearby residents, having particular regard to outlook, overshadowing and light levels, and the effect upon the living conditions of future residents, having particular regard to privacy and external and internal space
- whether the scheme would result in an unacceptable flood risk, having regard to surface water drainage
- the effect upon highway safety, having particular regard to parking
- the effect upon a protected habitat site
What decided it
The cumulative harm to character and appearance, living conditions, flood risk management, highway safety and protected habitat integrity, when weighed against the housing benefits, could not be justified under the development plan or the Framework's presumption in favour of sustainable development.
The substantial benefit of providing four additional homes in a location with a 3.1-year housing land supply shortfall, and modest benefits from efficient land use, sustainable location and retention of the public house, were outweighed by significant harm to character and appearance, living conditions of existing and future residents, unresolved flood risk and drainage concerns, ambiguous highway impacts, and unmitigated effects on a protected habitat site; the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SD4Policy SD9Policy SD14Policy INF1Policy INF2Policy A1Policy E1Policy E4Policy E6Policy F1Policy F6Policy G1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Gloucester City
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed21 September 2026601090958 Podsmead Rd, Gloucester, GL1 5PA
- Allowed8 May 20266004685Welland House, Meteor Court, 39 Barnett Way, Gloucester, GL4 3GG
- Dismissed30 January 202533474051 Alderton Close, Abbeymead, Gloucester, GL4 5UE
- Allowed17 January 202533505876 Sims Lane, Quedgeley, Gloucester, Gloucestershire, GL2 3NJ
- Dismissed9 January 20253347794Land to the Rear of 101 Reservoir Road, Gloucester , GL4 6SZ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®