Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 August 20266007188

Brook Close, Rodmarton, Cirencester, GL7 6PE

the demolition of existing dwelling and outbuildings and replacement with a new dwelling, garage and outbuilding, new landscaping and associated ancillary works (self-build development)

Authority
Cotswold
Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
GL7 6PE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the significance of a non-designated heritage asset (NDHA)
  • Whether the proposal would preserve the setting of the Grade II listed Little Tarlton
  • The effect of the proposal on the setting of the Rodmarton Conservation Area (CA)
  • The effect of the design of the replacement dwelling on the character and appearance of the surroundings

What decided it

The total loss of the non-designated heritage asset and its significance within the local context outweighed the limited benefits of the replacement dwelling.

The benefits of sustainability improvements, landscape and biodiversity enhancements, and self-build status were outweighed by the harm to the significance of the non-designated heritage asset through its total loss.

Plan policies cited: Policy EN1, Policy EN2, Policy EN8, Policy EN10, Policy EN11, Policy EN12

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.