Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 August 20266007188

Brook Close, Rodmarton, Cirencester, GL7 6PE

Planning appeal 6007188 at Brook Close, Rodmarton, Cirencester, GL7 6PE (Cotswold) was dismissed on 19 August 2026 by Inspector B Phillips, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the significance of a non-designated heritage asset (NDHA).

the demolition of existing dwelling and outbuildings and replacement with a new dwelling, garage and outbuilding, new landscaping and associated ancillary works (self-build development)

Authority
Cotswold
Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
B Phillips
Postcode
GL7 6PE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the significance of a non-designated heritage asset (NDHA)
  • Whether the proposal would preserve the setting of the Grade II listed Little Tarlton
  • The effect of the proposal on the setting of the Rodmarton Conservation Area (CA)
  • The effect of the design of the replacement dwelling on the character and appearance of the surroundings

What decided it

The total loss of the non-designated heritage asset and its significance within the local context outweighed the limited benefits of the replacement dwelling.

The benefits of sustainability improvements, landscape and biodiversity enhancements, and self-build status were outweighed by the harm to the significance of the non-designated heritage asset through its total loss.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EN1Policy EN2Policy EN8Policy EN10Policy EN11Policy EN12

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

No other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Cotswold

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266010613
    Land Rear of 88 Chesterton Lane, Cirencester, GL7 1YD
  2. Allowed5 August 20266006284
    Land Parcel North Of Olimpick Drive, Chipping Campden, GL55 6BL
  3. Dismissed26 June 20266003681
    Land off May Lane, Ebrington, GL55 6NJ
  4. Allowed15 June 20266002824
    Land North of The Wern, Lechlade, GL7 3DN
  5. Allowed5 June 20266002934
    Land East Of Cotswold Business Village, South of London Road, Moreton-in-Marsh, GL56 0JQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.