Planning appeal decision
The Orchard, Telham Lane, Battle, TN33 0SS
Planning appeal 6007214 at The Orchard, Telham Lane, Battle, TN33 0SS (Rother District Council) was dismissed on 12 August 2026 by Inspector G Sylvester, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to its location within the High Weald National Landscape.
the conversion of buildings to create a residential dwelling and annexe, together with associated car parking, garden and landscaping
- Authority
- Rother District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- G Sylvester
- Postcode
- TN33 0SS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to its location within the High Weald National Landscape
- Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development with particular regard to the spatial strategy and whether occupants would have adequate access to services and facilities
What decided it
The harm to the landscape and scenic beauty of the High Weald National Landscape, which carries weight of a high order and outweighs the modest benefits of housing delivery and economic contribution.
The modest socio-economic and environmental benefits of the small-scale proposal, including housing supply contribution and biodiversity enhancement, were substantially outweighed by the high-order harm to the landscape and scenic beauty of the High Weald National Landscape and the conflict with the spatial strategy, such that the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits and the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy OSS4Policy EN1Policy EN3Policy DEN1Policy DEN2Policy DEN7Policy OSS1Policy OSS2Policy DIM2Policy RA3Policy SRM1Policy TR3Policy OSS3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 14Paragraph 84
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rother District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed22 October 2026601553265 Westfield Lane, St Leonards on Sea, TN37 7NF
- Dismissed14 October 20266007775Land Adjacent to Broadlawns, Whitebread Lane, Beckley, TN31 6TY
- Dismissed12 October 20266010105Upper Morgay Wood, Junction Road, Staplecross, TN32 5SH
- Dismissed22 September 20266008634Barn House, Warren Road, Fairlight, TN35 4AN
- Allowed21 September 20266009677Black Cottage, Henley Down, Catsfield, TN33 9BN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®