Planning appeal decision
Cotters Hill Farm, Bug Hill, Woldingham, CR3 7LB
Planning appeal 6007271 at Cotters Hill Farm, Bug Hill, Woldingham, CR3 7LB (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 5 August 2026 by Inspector H Miles, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 and any relevant development plan policies.
demolition of existing mobile home dwelling and erection of self-build chalet bungalow dwelling, together with associated car parking
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- H Miles
- Postcode
- CR3 7LB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area including with regard to the Area of Great Landscape Value (AGLV) and the Surrey Hills National Landscape (NL)
- The effect of the proposed development on biodiversity
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt with no qualifying exception, causes substantial harm to openness and landscape character, and the limited benefits do not clearly outweigh this harm to constitute very special circumstances.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt through inappropriateness and loss of openness, combined with harm to the AGLV and National Landscape setting and unacceptable biodiversity effects, was not clearly outweighed by the limited economic and housing benefits, such that very special circumstances do not exist
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP10Policy DP13Policy CSP20
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Dismissed23 September 20266008688Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
- Dismissed22 September 20266011736Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®