Planning appeal decision
65-67 Yardley Road, Birmingham, B27 6LL
Planning appeal 6007769 at 65-67 Yardley Road, Birmingham, B27 6LL (Birmingham City Council) was dismissed on 8 October 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be permitted development under Schedule 2, Part 3, Class MA of the GPDO.
conversion of rear part of the shop into flat
- Authority
- Birmingham City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Postcode
- B27 6LL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be permitted development under Schedule 2, Part 3, Class MA of the GPDO
- whether the proposal would provide adequate natural light in all habitable rooms of the dwelling
What decided it
The Inspector could not be satisfied on the limited evidence before them that the rear extension fell within one or more of the classes specified in MA.1(2) of the GPDO for a continuous period of at least 2 years prior to the application date, and therefore the requirements of Class MA.1 were not met.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Birmingham City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed29 October 20266012986Land at the Rear of 79 Church Hill Road, Birmingham, B20 3PA
- Dismissed29 October 20266011902Wagamama, 51 Edgbaston Street, Birmingham, B5 4QL
- Dismissed27 October 2026601366222 Wash Lane, Birmingham, B25 8SB
- Dismissed22 October 2026601550360 Mildenhall Road, Great Barr, Birmingham, B42 2PQ
- Dismissed22 October 202660151469Brittan Close, Birmingham, B34 7NB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®