Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 September 20266008107

Dane Cottage, Hoggs Lane, Petham, CT4 5PJ

Planning appeal 6008107 at Dane Cottage, Hoggs Lane, Petham, CT4 5PJ (Canterbury City Council) was dismissed on 28 September 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would preserve a Grade II listed building, known as 'Dane Cottage', and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses.

Appeal type
other · Planning listed building and conservation area
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
CT4 5PJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve a Grade II listed building, known as 'Dane Cottage', and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses

What decided it

The proposed porch would fail to preserve the special interest of the Grade II listed building by reason of its size, prominence, roof form, and failure to respect the building's architectural composition, and the limited public benefits arising from the proposal are insufficient to outweigh this harm.

The low-level harm to the special interest of the listed building, which is a matter of considerable importance and weight under the Framework, outweighs the limited public benefits comprising modest economic benefit and primarily private benefits of improved accessibility and functionality.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DBE3Policy DBE6Policy HE1Policy HE4Policy HE5

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

11 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Canterbury City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed28 September 20266008105
    Dane Cottage, Hogg Lane, Petham, CT4 5PJ
  2. Allowed24 September 20266010614
    82 Island Wall, Whitstable, CT5 1EL
  3. Allowed18 September 20266009081
    Ground Floor, 2 Douglas Road, Herne Bay, CT6 6AE
  4. Dismissed11 August 20266009628
    69 Joy Lane, Whitstable, CT5 4DD
  5. Allowed3 August 20263345208
    Seasalter Holiday Park, 400 Faversham Road, Seasalter, Whitstable, CT5 4BW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.