Planning appeal decision
69 Joy Lane, Whitstable, CT5 4DD
4 two-storey detached dwellings with associated access, parking and landscaping
- Authority
- Canterbury City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Postcode
- CT5 4DD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- the integrity of the Thames, Medway and Swale SPA and Ramsar site and the Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay SPA and Ramsar Site
What decided it
Insufficient information was provided to enable an Appropriate Assessment to conclude that the proposal would not adversely affect the integrity of the protected European sites, and reasonable scientific doubt remained as to the absence of adverse effects either alone or in combination with other plans or projects.
The significant weight afforded to the conflict with the Habitats Regulations and the absence of adverse effects on protected sites outweighed the significant weight of delivering 4 market dwellings in a sustainable location and the moderate weight of economic benefits, such that the proposal conflicted with the development plan as a whole and the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.
Framework references: 11
Plan policies cited: Policy DBE3, Policy SP1, Policy SP6, Policy LB5
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®