Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 August 20266009628

69 Joy Lane, Whitstable, CT5 4DD

4 two-storey detached dwellings with associated access, parking and landscaping

Authority
Canterbury City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
CT5 4DD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the integrity of the Thames, Medway and Swale SPA and Ramsar site and the Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay SPA and Ramsar Site

What decided it

Insufficient information was provided to enable an Appropriate Assessment to conclude that the proposal would not adversely affect the integrity of the protected European sites, and reasonable scientific doubt remained as to the absence of adverse effects either alone or in combination with other plans or projects.

The significant weight afforded to the conflict with the Habitats Regulations and the absence of adverse effects on protected sites outweighed the significant weight of delivering 4 market dwellings in a sustainable location and the moderate weight of economic benefits, such that the proposal conflicted with the development plan as a whole and the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy DBE3, Policy SP1, Policy SP6, Policy LB5

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.