Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent to Stapeley Community Hall, Pear Tree Field, Stapeley, CW5 7GZ
Planning appeal 6008265 at Land Adjacent to Stapeley Community Hall, Pear Tree Field, Stapeley, CW5 7GZ (Cheshire East Council) was dismissed on 13 July 2026 by Inspector J Smith, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area.
proposed detached one bedroom dwelling
- Authority
- Cheshire East Council
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- J Smith
- Postcode
- CW5 7GZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposed development upon the ability to maintain and operate existing infrastructure apparatus
- the effect of an existing oak tree upon the living conditions of the future occupiers of the proposal, with specific regard to light and shading upon the rear garden area
- the effect of the scheme upon highway safety
- whether sufficient information has been provided to demonstrate that the proposed development would not have an adverse effect on protected species
- whether the proposed development would provide a biodiversity net gain
What decided it
The cumulative conflicts with the development plan across character, infrastructure, living conditions, highway safety and ecology, when weighed against the limited housing supply benefits, meant the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits under NPPF paragraph 11d)ii.
The limited benefit of providing one additional dwelling and contributing to housing supply was outweighed by significant harm to character and appearance, infrastructure operation, future occupiers' living conditions, highway safety, and ecological interests, with the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighing the benefits when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SD1Policy SD2Policy SE1Policy GEN1Policy H4Policy INF9Policy INF3Policy ENV1Policy ENV2Policy SE3Policy SE5Policy GS3Policy GS6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cheshire East
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed27 October 20266004692Land Adjoining Jenny Heyes, Heyes Lane, Alderley Edge, SK9 7LH
- Dismissed23 October 2026601496610 Cocksheadhey Road, Bollington, Macclesfield, SK10 5QZ
- Dismissed22 October 20266013754Teal House 4 Shrewbridge Walk, Baddington Lane Baddington Lane, Nantwich, CW5 8AF
- Dismissed20 October 2026601434367 Earle St, Crewe, CW1 2AS
- Dismissed16 October 20266015255Somerford Grange Trap Road, Somerford Booths, Congleton, CW12 2LT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®